Here come the Belarus universal time pouring mud presidential candidates. Sling can be anything. Although every voter understands that most goes to the future leaders of the country and the future leader of the opposition, it is hard to believe that someone will be responsible for defamation and spreading false information. Agree, goes not to the latest figures in any state.
What that time comes, knew everything. Prepared and hoarded these are the most slop in the cubbyhole and caches. Hoarded everything. Anyway, after election nobody will remember about some of the accusations opponents of any mortal sins, which are told by the “knowledgeable people”. Whoever wins will be in the euphoria of victory and the one who loses, will begin a campaign to discredit the elections. For the losers, all will be wrong!
In short, the situation is familiar to any adult who has ever survived the election campaign and elections of any level. In the ears of voters to cast anything that will lead to victory. And then the “after us the deluge,” “after the Eulogy” and other folk wisdom, justifying the deception of the people. Some of the issues that was raised by my interlocutors, I want to talk about today.
Why Belarus is like Ukraine
Do not rush to reproach the author’s ignorance of the material. How can it be that Belarus and Ukraine have become twins? Further many examples of the differences of living in these countries. Agree with all your arguments. Only here we must not consider the current state of the country, and the issue of the upcoming elections. How and for whom to vote, the people of Belarus.
Many of those with whom we communicate on issues of the Belarusian elections, have realized that the country is very clever trap. Very beautiful combination, a kind of zugzwang, in which any outcome will lead to the deterioration of life. It turned out that those who this trap was organized, even to think of anything it was not necessary. Elections will be held exactly the same scenario that Zelensky and elections in Ukraine.
Belarus and recently Ukraine, split. One part in favour of the incumbent President as the guarantor of the continuation is not rich, but quite calm and measured life. The guarantor of the let sophisticated, but friendly relations with Russia. A guarantee that the government will not allow civil war.
The other part of the population is much more radical. “Enough to sit in the swamp”, “Belarus must become a modern democratic state” and so on. People truly hate the current President. Ready to vote though for someone. For them the main thing that the current President did not once again President. They do not need a program or a plan out of the crisis. This is the second time.
Remember: isn’t it in Ukraine? Candidate Zelensky voiced their political, economic or any kind of program? No. Moreover, the apparent disadvantages of the candidates Zelensky was then called virtues. Never ran anything significant? So it’s good. Not gain the officials are bad! Was not involved in politics? Also good. Will be out of politics! International relations? So good that I never found that. Will learn on the fly the best!
Very good work of the enemies of Belarus. It’s like on the fast part of the track to stack two deep pits so that the driver had a choice. To fly I pit left or right wheel. The result was always the same: crash. But the choice was…
Who for the people?
This question is probably the most frequently encountered in talking about political parties, candidates or MPs. In General, during the election campaign, people feel the center of the Universe. Or the Central figure in the state. All the candidates in unison singing the praises of the people and promise to solve all his problems.
Has anyone seen the future Deputy, who would be in the program said that will make the life of the common man unbearable? And corrupt person who would never have talked about the need to fight corruption, seen? So how to distinguish them? How to identify a good candidate?
In fact, the answer to this question, many already know. Just don’t know what the answer is, pardon the pun. Remember the anecdote about the granddaughter of a Decembrist and her surprise that the revolution in favour of the country was not rich? Here is the answer.
Thousands of years mankind has tried to solve the problem of poverty. The state of the minds of antiquity understood that wealth inequality breeds anti-government sentiment. How many attempts was to divide everything equally among all, so everyone was happy! And what an end? Very quickly someone has become poor, having sold everything, but someone rich, all buying.
And this was not from meanness of human nature, but from the differences between people. One smarter than the other, another masterful, the third is stronger, more cunning than the fourth, the fifth… Even the desire to work plays a role. Someone willing to work day and night to achieve a goal, and someone in only their eight hours.
Probably the only solution to this issue, to which it had various options of war communism. Economic equality for the poor. The division of income is not according to the principle “more — for-more”, and all equally. But the incentive to work disappeared. I remember it perfectly gardeners Soviet era, are on their 6 acres achieved yields significantly higher than on the collective or state farm fields.
Back to the present. We offer several solutions to the problem of poverty of people. Again, this is the old with a modern twist. No more.
First, the version of “war communism.” To take everything from the rich and fairly divided among all. Probably the most popular option among people with “very average” and sometimes “very high” with modern education. How many times have each of us heard this? What will happen in the future with the implementation of this option I wrote above.
Secondly, to create conditions and opportunities for its people. To force a person to become a businessman. To create a set of almost rich people, the middle class, which says a lot about recently. Alas, all become businessmen can’t. Scientists have proven that actually engage in successful business can be quite a small percentage of people. Simply put, talent is needed. So, either the collapse of the majority or a huge investment in useless “initiatives” of psevdoberemennost.
Thirdly, just to stop to take care of “unnecessary” government of the people and all the resources spent on improving the lives of the middle class. However, in this case, under middle class means everyone who has a job. A sort of theory of dividing society into different sorts of people.
There are other possible solutions to the problem of poverty. But they’re only imitation of work. In fact, to make everyone happy is impossible. As, for example, to solve the problem of the homeless. Impossible simply because there are people who just like to live. So you just have to provide the poor a standard of living which corresponds to the rank of a person.
Probably, in my opinion, those who propose such a scenario, and for the people. But the choice still remains for each person. Independent choice.
Is it possible to overcome corruption?
Probably, the fight against corruption are traditional in every country of the world. No countries, where there was no this phenomenon in different forms. Even where there are strict regimes, corruption is not uncommon.
Any candidate in his election program pledges its future fight against this corruption. And quickly forget after the election. The whole struggle and all the hatred of this shameful phenomenon is evident when a law enforcement someone caught by the hand. By the way, this applies to any of us.
However, each of us has a friend, acquaintance, schoolmate, fellow student, which could solve some issues without unnecessary red tape. And quickly as we would like. Quite little questions. We’d decided. We just have not enough time, we don’t like to sit in queues, there are more important things to do… so we have to call the other.
Not here begins the corruption? If we are not its source? Do we not each carry the same bottle of cognac as a “thank you”? And then, when a friend is successfully moving up the career ladder, do we not resent in case of failure on the “little” request? Do we not tell our friends how arrogant this former friend, after becoming the big boss?
To beat corruption is necessary in his own head. Not in another, and in their own. And those who are now caught in a multimillion-dollar bribes, kickbacks, on the embezzlement of the state budget, just thieves! It is the thieves, which later caught.
Instead of a conclusion
Today I pity the Belarusians. What a pity the voters of any country where there is election campaign for a seat in the Executive or legislative power. I feel sorry for the Americans, which the head fool now the Democrats and Republicans. Just a pity because in USA this drug was the cause of death of several people.
Indeed, it is difficult to understand, where truth and a lie. Hard to believe or not to believe the facts or the alleged facts reported by the press. Self-selection of some shaken. We, the Russians, through it also repeatedly passed.
I don’t think a grown man having an experience of political struggle may change, becoming a presidential candidate. He can play a role, as did the artist Zelensky in Ukraine, but change is unlikely. It can become “obeschalkinym”, but can’t change. Therefore it is necessary to choose not what we see after all the slop poured out upon their heads, and of those who knew before the election campaign.
© 2007-2020, All Rights Reserved Nigeria|Somalia|Sudan|Tunisia|News|WarWhy are the citizens of Belarus have to make a choice without a choice?